Resolution of Kashmir crisis is becoming exceedingly arduous

Whatever may the developments in regional politics (Indian subcontinent) or India-Pakistan relations (which is at nadir now), it looks as if Kashmir is going to remain in the same position. The ‘Paradise on Earth’, which has become the title of Kashmir thanks to the foreign tourists, is under the grip of decades-old insurgency. There is no doubt that different forms of violence have been manifested in this picturesque land. The insurgency or the mass-insurrection or the spate of terrorism (you may exemplify it in anyway you like) that had its commencement in 1989 has already claimed thousands of lives. These include civilians, Indian security forces along with Kashmiri and non-Kashmiri militants.

Can there be any solution in this rugged and violence-infested terrain? This question has been raised by many already but there has been no solution so far. It is also not possible perhaps. While on one side there is the mighty presence of India, the ISI backed militant groups are on the other and with contending views. Nevertheless, there have been lots of attempts to break the ice in the meantime but all have become futile.

What has the latest statement of Lashkar-e-Tayyeba (LeT) spokesman Abdullah Gaznavi conveyed therefore? The LeT spokesman stated that they would shun violence provided that the international mediation takes apposite measures to end the ongoing conflict like holding a discussion on Kashmir’s freedom. Gaznavi also said in his statement issued to the Kashmiri press, “Armed struggle was a compulsion as the world had failed to acknowledge the struggle and yearning of Kashmiris” which portrays the Kashmir was compelled to wage war against the State of India.

A considerable section of the India-controlled Kashmir’s leadership has welcomed this approach and leaders like Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and People’s Democratic Party chief Mehbooba Mufti have found a new ray of hope in it. What has been the reaction of the Union Government? The Government of India, it seems, is not paying any attention to this at all and considers it to be the handiwork of ISI to divert the attention from LeT who is alleged as responsible for the terror attacks on Mumbai.

Can there be any dialogue in this atmosphere of mistrust? Will it become successful even if there is any? We are the last to count on any such assurances even if there is any international mediation.