Thursday, December 24, 2009

Can US leaders restrain subsequent healthcare legislation hurdles?


How can a struggle be won? Lots of pundits are there to express personal standpoints in this context but we, commoners remain in need of extremely explicit specimens to stimulate ourselves. US healthcare reform Bill – gallant struggle to set up the essence and to emerge victorious after a long, arduous struggle, if truth be told, is itself a specimen that will encourage the generations to come.

The history was created as soon as US Senate approved the ground-breaking legislation and by now it’s a reality that it would play a great role in extending healthcare for tens of millions of uninsured Americans. Now the question remains whether the victors can have a sigh of relief yet and the reasons are not hard to see.

As per a considerable section of pertinent analysts, substantial hurdles await the legislation to a large extent. It has come to the knowledge that the work will embark on in the New Year to reconcile the Senate legislation with a House of Representatives Bill that was passed last month, which is more left wing. Make a note of this as well. Potentially tough negotiations are likely all over January for the reason that the two Bills have significant differences.

Experts state that the Senate Bill does not include the "public option" - a government-backed insurance programme - which is a crucial part of the House legislation. The provision is likely to be hard fought for by liberals in the House. Nevertheless any public option risks losing the key votes of moderate Democrats in both the House and Senate.

Is this all? Perhaps not! Another conceptual separation between the two bodies is how the reforms will be financed. The House Bill would enforce a surtax on high-earning individuals and couples, whereas the Senate Bill applies a 40 per cent tax to be paid by insurance companies on alleged "Cadillac plans" or the health insurance premiums that cost above $8,500 a year for individuals and $23,000 for families.

No comments:

Post a Comment